Have nothing to do with the [evil] things that people do, things that belong to the darkness. Instead, bring them out to the light... [For] when all things are brought out into the light, then their true nature is clearly revealed...

-Ephesians 5:11-13

Category Archives: Crime

Brett Kavanaugh About to Prove His Constitutional Mettle

This article was published by The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor on Wednesday, March 4, 2020: 

Back in 2016, when Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh was a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in a minority opinion he wrote this about Senator Elizabeth Warren’s evil brainchild, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: “When measured in terms of unilateral power, the Director of the CFPB is the single most powerful official in the entire U.S. Government, other than the President. Indeed, within his jurisdiction, the Director of the CFPB can be considered even more powerful than the President.”

Kavanaugh added that “independent agencies collectively constitute, in effect, a headless fourth branch of the U.S. government. They hold enormous power and in the absence of Presidential supervision and direction, independent agencies [such as the CFPB] pose a significant threat to individual liberty and to the constitutional system of separation of powers and checks and balances.”

Now he has the opportunity to declare the CFPB unconstitutional, and fire the first round in the war against all other agencies that violate the U.S. Constitution.

Calling it the most important case of the year, the Wall Street Journal urged the Supreme Court to declare the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) unconstitutional. The justices began hearing arguments on the matter on Tuesday morning.

The agency, the brainchild of Senator Elizabeth Warren, was specifically and intentionally designed not only to be independent of Congress and the President but also to

Keep reading…

Supreme Court Hears Arguments Today on Critical Separation of Powers Case

This article appeared online at TheNewAmerican.com on Tuesday, March 3, 2020: 

Calling it the most important case of the year, the Wall Street Journal urged the Supreme Court to declare the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) unconstitutional. The justices began hearing arguments on the matter on Tuesday morning.

The agency, the brainchild of Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), was specifically and intentionally designed not only to be independent of Congress and the president but also to gather unto itself all three separate powers inimical to the U.S. Constitution: law-maker, judge, and enforcer. To make matters worse, the agency is funded by the Federal Reserve rather than Congress, thus avoiding Congressional oversight. It resides in the Eccles Building, which also houses the Fed, and is run by a single dictator who cannot be fired except for cause.

The agency was included in Dodd-Frank, the bill Congress passed following the 2008 financial crisis. It immediately began harassing legitimate businesses by issuing rules and then finding companies that violated them. Once found, they would be threatened with outrageous fines.

One of its victims, a sole practitioner law firm that specializes in consumer lending, received a demand that it turn over its records in order to determine if it had violated certain telemarketing rules the agency had written. The owner, Aissac Aiono, refused. The head of the agency pressed the matter. Aiono sued, claiming that the agency, and its titular head, was unconstitutional since it violated the separation of powers doctrine inherent in the U.S. Constitution.

That case, Seila Law v. CFPB, is now being heard by the Supreme Court.

The New American exposed the CFPB in June 2018 when its acting director, Mick Mulvaney, culled the agency’s board of directors by firing all 25 of them. Mulvaney, a Trump appointee, called the agency a “sad, sick joke” and “essentially a one-person dictatorship.” There is no congressional oversight on its activities, it writes its own laws, it investigates any violations of those laws and then fines those who have violated them. In simple terms, Warren’s brainchild is, as it was designed to be, a rogue agency.

Aiono, with the help of a number of other attorneys, crafted the brief, noting in particular that the president can’t fire the head of the agency except for “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.”

When a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in 2016 that the structure of the CFPB was unconstitutional, then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh wrote: “When measured in terms of unilateral power, the Director of the CFPB is the single most powerful official in the entire U.S. Government, other than the President. Indeed, within his jurisdiction, the Director of the CFPB can be considered even more powerful than the President.”

Kavanaugh added that “independent agencies collectively constitute, in effect, a headless fourth branch of the U.S. government. Because of their massive power and the absence of Presidential supervision and direction, independent agencies pose a significant threat to individual liberty and to the constitutional system of separation of powers and checks and balances.”

The Court has three options. It may simply rule that the agency’s demand for documents from Aiono’s law firm is invalid and unenforceable. It may eliminate the “for cause” provision from the law, thus allowing the president to fire the director “at will” instead.

Or, the Court can declare the entire agency unconstitutional, invalidating the entire statute that created the agency.

The Journal is recommending the third option: “Tossing the whole law would invalidate all CFPB actions to date,” including its demand for documents from Aiono’s law firm. After all, wrote the Journal in its editorial, “the Court also did this when it overturned Barack Obama’s illegal recess appointments [in 2014].… If the current Court is serious about reviving the original meaning of the separation of powers, the CFPB is an ideal opportunity to send a shot heard ’round Washington.”

It will also present an “ideal opportunity” for now-Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh to apply the same thinking he did in 2016 to the present case and declare that the rogue agency is unconstitutional. If he can persuade a majority of justices to agree, then perhaps this “shot heard ’round Washington” might be the opening round in the war to restore the Constitution to its rightful place as the supreme law of the land. Once this specific cancer is excised, then other agencies could be subjected to the same analysis and conclusion.

Democrats Seize the Opportunity to Investigate Trump Again

This article was published by The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor on Friday, February 14, 2020:

It was barely a week since the president was exonerated by the Senate when the Democrats found another reason to investigate him: “political interference” in the pending sentencing of Roger Stone.

During Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, Roger Stone created “back-channel” communications with WikiLeaks in order to learn more about the stolen emails that were damaging to Hillary Clinton’s campaign. When the Mueller investigation uncovered Stone’s efforts, it turned its focus on him. In November, Stone was convicted on seven counts, including witness tampering and lying to the investigators.

He is due to be sentenced next week.

The Department of Justice prosecutors had recommended that Stone be sent up for seven to nine years for his crimes. Stone’s defense attorneys argued that the guideline for first-time offenders is 15 to 21 months.

When the president learned of the outrageous demand by the prosecutors, he tweeted late Monday night: “This is a horrible and very unfair situation. The real crimes were on the other side, as nothing happens to them. Cannot allow this miscarriage of justice!”

The next day,

Keep reading…

Justice Department Charges Huawei With Racketeering in New Indictment

This article appeared online at TheNewAmerican.com on Friday, February 14, 2020: 

The U.S. Department of Justice released an expanded indictment of China’s telecommunications giant Huawei on Thursday, claiming that the world’s largest technology company is acting like the Mafia in its operations: lying, cheating, and stealing in its efforts to destroy its enemies and dominate the globe.

The indictment supersedes two previous indictments issued last year and expands the charges to include a conspiracy to violate the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). The indictment also adds a charge of conspiracy to steal trade secrets through the company’s “long running practice of using fraud and deception to misappropriate [steal] sophisticated technology from U.S. [competitors],” said the department in its press release. Added the release:

Keep reading…

Democrats Call for Investigation Into Trump’s Alleged Interference in Roger Stone Sentencing

This article appeared online at TheNewAmerican.com on Thursday, February 13, 2020:

With time on their hands now that the faux Trump investigation has fizzled. House Democrats now have an opportunity to open a new investigation into the president’s alleged misbehaviors.

During Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, Roger Stone created “back-channel” communications with WikiLeaks in order to learn more about the stolen e-mails that were damaging to Hillary Clinton’s campaign. When the Mueller investigation uncovered Stone’s efforts, it turned its focus on him. In November Stone was convicted on seven counts, including witness tampering and lying to the investigators.

He is due to be sentenced next week.

The Department of Justice prosecutors had recommended that Stone be imprisoned for seven to nine years for his crimes. Stone’s defense attorneys argued that the guideline for first-time offenders is 15 to 21 months.

When the president learned of the matter, he tweeted late Monday night:

Keep reading…

Congressional Lawmakers Press AG Barr to Investigate China’s Propaganda Mouthpiece, China Daily

This article appeared online at TheNewAmerican.com on Sunday, February 9, 2020: 

Thirty-five lawmakers sought a response from U.S. Attorney General William Barr about reports that the Chinese Communist Party has been violating this country’s Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) for years.

The demand in the form of a letter sent last Thursday followed reports from the Washington Free Beacon in December that China Daily has for years been acting as a transmission belt for communist propaganda without complying with FARA. Said the Beacon: “China Daily, an official mouthpiece of the Chinese Communist Party, has published hundreds of propaganda articles designed to look like ordinary news stories in some of America’s most influential newspapers…. The propaganda outlet has repeatedly violated [FARA] by failing to provide full disclosures about its purchases.”

For example,

Keep reading…

Backdoor Attack on Second Amendment Through Credit Card Transactions

This article appeared online at TheNewAmerican.com on Monday, January 27, 2020: 

Representative Jennifer Wexton (D-Va.) has devised another way to attack the rights of law-abiding gun owners: tracking their purchases of firearms using credit cards.

The core of her bill (H.R. 5132, the Gun Violence Prevention Through Financial Intelligence Act) seems, on the surface, innocuous enough:

To request information for financial institutions for the purpose of developing an advisory about the identification and reporting of suspicious activity … relating to how homegrown violent extremists and perpetrators of domestic terrorism procure firearms … for the purpose of carrying out “lone actor” or “lone wolf” acts of terror within the United States.

Said Wexton when introducing her bill:

Keep reading…

The Real Reactionaries Are Anti-gun Politicians Who Seek to Punish Law-abiding Citizens for Criminals’ Lawlessness

This article was published by The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor on Monday, January 27,  2020: 

“If a crime involves the use of a firearm, it must be the firearm’s fault” is almost the automatic reaction of anti-gun politicians plagued by crime in their jurisdictions. Since guns were involved in all three of the shootings that occurred in Seattle, Washington last week, politicians are threatening to infringe further on law-abiding gun owners’ precious rights in retaliation.

Following the third shooting in Seattle in as many days, Mayor Jenny Durkan said “We will not allow this to be the new normal. We know gun violence is preventable and are taking urgent action.”

A similar statement was issued by Congressional Representative Democrat Pramila Jayapal, who pointed to the need for stronger gun controls.

The shooting Wednesday night in front of a McDonald’s located in Seattle’s high crime area was gang-related. One of the three thugs was wounded while the other two bolted but were later apprehended by police. Seven bystanders caught in the crossfire following an argument were either killed or wounded.

The thug who was wounded, 21-year-old Jamel Jackson, was booked into jail for unlawful possession of a firearm following being treated at a local hospital. The other two who bolted from the scene

Keep reading…

Seattle Politicos Call for More Gun Control Following Third Shooting in Three Days

This article appeared online at TheNewAmerican.com on Friday, January 24, 2020: 

Following the third shooting in Seattle in as many days, Mayor Jenny Durkan said on Thursday, “We will not allow this to be the new normal. We know gun violence is preventable and are taking urgent action.”

A similar statement was issued by Representative Democrat Pramila Jayapal, who pointed to the need for stronger gun control.

The shooting Wednesday night in front of a McDonald’s located in Seattle’s high-crime area was gang-related. One of the three thugs was wounded, while the other two bolted but were later apprehended by police. Seven bystanders caught in the crossfire following an argument were either killed or wounded.

The thug who was wounded, 21-year-old Jamel Jackson, was booked into jail for unlawful possession of a firearm following being treated at a local hospital. The other two who bolted from the scene were captured shortly afterwards. Between the three of them, they have a history of more than 65 arrests for numerous felonies and misdemeanors and yet, despite Seattle’s strict gun controls, they were able to obtain the firearms they used in the gang war.

Marquise Latrelle Tolbert has been arrested 21 times, convicted of three felonies and 12 gross misdemeanors. William Ray Tolliver has been arrested 44 times, convicted of one felony, 18 gross misdemeanors, and one misdemeanor. Both are 24 years old.

Police Chief Carmen Best said the shooting was

Keep reading…

Critics of “Red Flag” Laws Said They Would Be Abused, and so They Are

This article was published by The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor on Wednesday, January 22, 2020: 

From the beginning, critics of “red flag” laws have warned about their potential abuse by people seeking to harass, intimidate, and punish perceived enemies who legally own firearms without having to charge them with a crime. ERPOs (extreme risk protection orders) avoid the necessity of having to conform to the U.S. Constitution’s 4th, 5th, and 14th Amendments. These guarantee “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures … and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause.” They further mandate that no person shall be “deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.”

Red flag laws have turned these guarantees on their heads, as explained by Raheem Williams. Writing for the Foundation of Economic Education, Williams noted:

Keep reading…

Judge Denies Red Flag Demand Because Petitioner Lied

This article appeared online at TheNewAmerican.com on Tuesday, January 21, 2020: 

Chief Judge Stephen Howard in Fort Collins, Colorado, last Thursday denied a “red flag” (aka “extreme risk protection order,” or ERPO) petition from Susan Holmes against a police officer because she lied on the form. It was the fifth petition to be filed since January 1, when Colorado’s new “red flag” law became effective.

Holmes thought she could use the new law to punish the police officer who shot and killed her son in self-defense in 2017. She’s been carrying a grudge ever since.

Back in 2017, Susan, the mother of 19-year-old Jeremy, called the police because Jeremy was threatening to kill his brother. When Colorado State University (CSU) police officer Phillip Morris and his partner confronted Jeremy, they demanded that he put down the knife he was brandishing. The video from the body cam Morris was wearing can be viewed online. In a span of less than two minutes, Morris demanded that Jeremy put down his knife more than 30 times. Jeremy can be heard saying that he didn’t want to live and asking the officers to shoot him. When Morris started to reholster his sidearm in order to access his Taser, Jeremy ran toward Morris. Four rounds were fired by the officers, and Jeremy was dead.

Ever since then,

Keep reading…

No Mention of China’s Human Rights Violations During Trade Deal Signing

This article appeared online at TheNewAmerican.com on Wednesday, January 15, 2020: 

Missing during the self-congratulatory handshaking that accompanied the signing of the Phase One trade deal on Wednesday was any mention that China remains one of the worst offenders of human rights in the world, if not in all of human history. It wouldn’t have been politic to bring up such a sordid subject. One wouldn’t want to spoil the mood. For the millions suffering from human-rights abuses and violations in China, the silence was deafening.

A week ago, the Congressional-Executive Commission on China issued its report on those abuses, stating that “the human rights and rule of law conditions in China continued to worsen this past year.” The 24-page report expounded and expanded on those abuses:

Keep reading…

CNN Settles $275 Million Defamation Lawsuit Brought by Covington Student

This article appeared online at TheNewAmerican.com on Wednesday, January 8, 2020: 

Fox19 out of Newport, Kentucky, was the first to announce the out of court settlement of a $275 million defamation lawsuit brought against CNN by Nicholas Sandmann, a student at Covington Catholic High School (CovCath).

The lawsuit stemmed from an incident that CNN transformed into a transmission belt for its anti-Trump hatred. Following the incident last January at the Lincoln Memorial, CNN declared that Sandmann, then a junior at CovCath, was a racist. The network repeated the canard that Sandmann had confronted a Native American while wearing a MAGA (Make America Great Again) baseball cap, thus proving that Trump is a racist along with his followers.

Two videos released in the days following the event (see Sources below for links) showed no such thing, but by that time it was too late. For seven days, CNN, along with the Washington Post and NBC, promoted the lie. In fact, that additional footage showed that it was a hate group called the Black Hebrew Israelites that initially provoked the confrontation by hurling racial slurs and epithets at the students as they were waiting for their bus following a March for Life event. Nathan Phillips, part of a separate event taking place nearby, the Indigenous Peoples March, saw his opportunity and confronted the students.

Sandmann’s lead attorney, L. Lin Wood, said that “CNN was probably more vicious in its direct attack on Nicholas than the Washington Post. And CNN goes into millions of homes. They really went after Nicholas with the idea that he was part of a mob that was attacking the Black Hebrew Israelites, yelling racist slurs at the Black Hebrew Israelites. Totally false.”

The 15-minute YouTube video Wood created has been viewed more than two million times. In its lede into the video he published last February, he wrote, “Two weeks ago, the mainstream media, politicians, church officials, commentators, and celebrities rushed to judgment to wrongfully condemn, threaten, disparage and vilify Nick Sandmann based solely on a few seconds of an out-of-context video clip. It only takes 15 minutes to learn the truth. Here it is.”

Added Wood: “If you took the time to look at the full context of what happened that day, Nicholas Sandmann did absolutely nothing wrong. He was, as I’ve said to others, the only adult in the room. But you have a situation where CNN couldn’t resist the idea that here’s a guy with a young boy, that Make America Great Again cap on. So they go after him.”

And for that “rushing to judgment,” CNN is paying a steep price. Although the amount of the settlement of the $275 million lawsuit remains undisclosed, CNN’s reputation as a reliable reporter of the news has been further besmirched.

Wood held nothing back in his filing of Sandman’s lawsuit against CNN:

Keep reading…

U.S. Officials Say North Korea’s Promise of a “Christmas Gift” Could Be Missile Launch

This article appeared online at TheNewAmerican.com on Monday, December 23, 2019: 

North Korea’s “engine test” on December 8 — described by North Korean military officials as “crucial” in its development of long-range missiles — has U.S. officials worried. They worry that it’s a sign that all further negotiations over the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula are off the table. They worry that North Korea’s “rocket man,” Kim Jong-un, will light off a missile to test President Trump’s resolve, perceiving Trump to be vulnerable while under pressure from his impeachment threat and his reelection chances next year.

On December 3, Ri Thae Song, North Korea’s minster of foreign affairs, said that recent calls by Washington for another round of talks between President Trump and Kim are “nothing but a foolish trick hatched to keep [North Korea] bound to dialogue and use it in favor of the political situation and election in the U.S.… What is left is entirely up to the U.S. [as to] what Christmas gift it will select to get.”

North Korea first detonated a nuclear device in 2006. During the early months of the Trump administration, the North Korean dictator decided to test the mettle of the new president by

Keep reading…

Enjoy the Pause in the Impeachment Action. It Won’t Last Long.

This article was published by The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor on Monday, December 23, 2019:

Like two sumo wrestlers circling each other at the beginning of a match, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Democrat) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (Republican) are each waiting for the other to make the first move.

The analogy is imperfect: one of the wrestlers can’t wrestle, doesn’t want to wrestle, and knows the outcome if she does wrestle.

After rushing to judgment, Pelosi now wants to delay the process, using the flimsiest of excuses: “We cannot name managers [to present our case to the Senate] until we see what the process is on the Senate side. So far, we haven’t seen anything that looks fair to us.”

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell called her move a stall and a comedy:

Keep reading…

Black Lives Matter Spawned by a Self-Defense Shooting Eight Years Ago

This article was published by The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor on Friday, December 6, 2019: 

Three Marxists needed a “cause célèbre” and the self-defense shooting of Trayvon Martin by neighborhood watchman George Zimmerman in February 2012 served perfectly. From that incident arose Black Lives Matter (BLM), an entity which continues to plague our society, and local police, to this day.

The lawsuit filed by Zimmerman on Tuesday against Martin’s parents, their family attorney, and related parties for $100 million is serving to remind readers that big gates often swing on little hinges.

On the surface, the self-defense shooting should have been covered adequately by the local paper in Sanford, Florida: “Night watchman attacked, kills attacker in self-defense.” End of story.

Except that the attacker was black and the defender was white

Keep reading…

George Zimmerman Sues Trayvon Martin’s Parents, Others for $100 Million Claiming Coverup During His Trial

This article appeared online at TheNewAmerican.com on Thursday, December 5, 2019: 

In a lawsuit filed by his attorney on Tuesday, George Zimmerman, the neighborhood watchman who was forced to defend himself using deadly force against Trayvon Martin the night of February 26, 2012, claimed that many parties involved in his trial fabricated evidence in an attempt to convict him of murder.

Their efforts failed when he was found not guilty. But the manipulations behind the attempt to convict Zimmerman of murder just recently came to light. Hence the lawsuit.

Zimmerman named Martin’s parents, Martin’s alleged girlfriend and her coached “stand in,” the Martin family attorney, the prosecutor, and the Florida Department of Law Enforcement in the lawsuit, claiming that each of them had a hand in “conspiring to switch and/or cover up the identity of [Martin’s girlfriend] who was the real phone witness to the events prior to Trayvon Martin’s death, by substituting an imposter and fake witness … to assist in committing perjury in sworn testimony to cause the arrest, prosecution, and sentencing to life in prison of George Zimmerman, as well as causing a federal investigation and prosecution of Zimmerman for civil rights violations.”

That’s a mouthful and sounds like grist for a John Grisham legal thriller.

Grisham should have such an imagination. The evidence came to light when a third party, Joel Gilbert, was doing a backgrounder on a documentary he was developing about Florida politico Andrew Gillum. Gillum served as city commissioner for Tallahassee when Zimmerman was forced to defend himself and later became mayor of Tallahassee.

Let Gilbert tell his story:

Keep reading…

Americans Arming Themselves at Record Rates

This article appeared online at TheNewAmerican.com on Tuesday, December 3, 2019:  

Rising anti-gun rhetoric from Democrat presidential hopefuls, and the entry of anti-gun Michael Bloomberg into the fray last week, has driven background checks to record levels, according to the FBI. The agency reported that it conducted 202,465 gun background checks on Black Friday, the second-highest number since the bureau implemented the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, or NICS. The record was recorded on Black Friday 2017 when the FBI ran 203,086 checks.

While gun background checks do not have a one-on-one correlation to purchases (many purchasers buy more than one firearm with a single background check), it indicates that more Americans than ever are enjoying their Second Amendment right to purchase, possess, and use (“keep and bear”) firearms. By the end of the year it is estimated that Americans will own upwards of 400 million of them.

And the far-left progressives now in control of the Democrat Party want to take them away, or at least greatly restrict their ownership and use. 2020 Democrat presidential candidates such as Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren, and Bernie Sanders have used the English language to cover up their intentions, claiming they “respect” the Second Amendment but want “common sense” gun laws to reduce gun violence.

But during a Democrat debate in September, former candidate Beto O’Rourke lifted the veil: “Hell, yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47!”

Matt Boggs, the owner of Alpha Dog Firearms in Tempe, Arizona, saw this blatant announcement of intent as a marketing opportunity, posting this on his store’s Facebook page:

Keep reading…

China Using “Thousand Talents Plan” to Steal U.S. Technology and Become World Hegemon

This article appeared online at TheNewAmerican.com on Tuesday, November 19, 2019: 

Another effort to warn U.S. citizens of the imminent and mounting threats to their sovereignty went largely unreported on Monday. A staff report from the U.S. Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations entitled “Threats to the U.S. Research Enterprise: China’s Talent Recruitment Plans” should have been called “China’s plans to rule the World Through the Theft of U.S. Technology.”

The report details “not only the lengths and expense China has gone to in order to steal American intellectual property, but also the shocking fact [that] our own federal agencies have done little to stop their actions despite being aware of [them].”

Its summary is chilling:

Keep reading…

Run, Do Not Walk, Away from the Aramco IPO

This article was published by The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor on Monday, November 18, 2019: 

Even before becoming the crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) had big dreams. If he could raise $100 billion, he might be able, if he moved swiftly enough, to keep his kingdom from becoming irrelevant.

He posited the idea in 2016: sell five percent of the government’s only asset – Aramco, officially the Saudi Arabian Oil Company – to unsuspecting investors who think that it’s worth $2 trillion. In 2018, he began to draw up plans to redirect the country’s total dependence upon oil revenues towards real estate development, tourist destinations, industrial parks, improved transportation, and other infrastructure improvements. He called it his “Vision 2030.”

His path became twisted, slowing the initial offering of shares. He met resistance from inside the kingdom, so he had to do some housecleaning. There was the murder and dismemberment of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi last October, which MBS denied any knowledge of, but which forced Fitch Ratings to downgrade the government’s credit rating. And then there were the attacks on the company’s oil fields in September, letting all the world see just how vulnerable those facilities are in a highly volatile and explosive Middle East.

Nevertheless, Aramco, MBS’s “crown jewel” announced on Sunday that it is only offering 1.5% of itself for sale in December, at a price far less than MBS had hoped for. And if things don’t meet even those minimum, now greatly reduced expectations, he could pull the offering altogether before it goes public in December.

Analysts looking through the 600-page prospectus that was released last week on the deal aren’t impressed,

Keep reading…

Many of the articles on Light from the Right first appeared on either The New American or the McAlvany Intelligence Advisor.
Copyright © 2020 Bob Adelmann