This article was published by The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor on Wednesday, February 5, 2020:
Now that the newly compliant Democrat-controlled legislature in Richmond, Virginia has passed most of Democrat Governor Ralph Northam’s gun controls, he faces the next challenge: how to enforce them.
He says he’s up to the challenge.
Following the Democrat Party’s takeover of both houses in Virginia last November, the party gained control of both the legislature and the governor’s mansion for the first time in a generation. Gun owners awakened, saw what was coming and pressured nearly all of the state’s counties and many of its cities to pass “Second Amendment sanctuary” resolutions. These were passed to protest the coming abrogation of their rights by politicians in Richmond, the state’s capitol.
The governor’s spokeswoman Alena Yarmosky, referring specifically to one of those bills (making it a felony for a gun owner to “recklessly leave a loaded, unsecured firearm” in a way that endangers a minor) said “This bill will keep children safe from loaded, unsecured firearms.” She added that this “is something that everyone … should support.”
But what if they don’t? Will those resolutions keep Governor Ralph Northam from enforcing them anyway?
When he was asked, Northam said they will be enforced, and any law enforcement officer, including county sheriffs, who doesn’t will face “consequences”:
If we have constitutional laws on the books and law enforcement officers are not enforcing those laws on the books, then there are going to be consequences.
But I’ll cross that bridge if and when we get to it.
That moment is getting closer every day. Richard Schragger, a professor at the University of Virginia’s School of Law, says those resolutions are just “a political statement” without teeth, that they are “mostly expressive and symbolic” declarations. He added that “In Virginia, state law supersedes local law. Citizens and local officials have to comply with state law even if a county declares itself to be a Second Amendment sanctuary.”
But some sheriffs don’t see if that way. Instead they take the position that they are accountable only to those citizens who elected them. As Philip Van Cleave, president of the Virginia Citizens Defense League (VCDL) noted, “If a county passes a resolution, the sheriff is a constitutional officer. No one [but the citizens who elected him] tells him what to do.”
For Nelson County Sheriff David Hill, the U.S. Constitution overrides Richmond’s attempted infringements:
As a constitutional officer – as sheriff – I’m here to protect the rights of citizens against things like unlawful search and seizure. State and federal agencies don’t come in unless we ask them to.
As far as sanctuaries: the individual has the right to bear arms. As long as they have proper credentials, then that’s fine. Our office isn’t going to knock on doors and we aren’t going to allow people to come in and round up firearms and what have you. If [the individual is] mentally competent and not a felon, there shouldn’t be a problem.
As long as the Constitution reads the way I read it, we’re going to be okay.
What if Northam decides to press the matter – to cross that bridge – and send in state enforcement people? Said Hill: “… coming in and taking all firearms? That’s not going to happen.”
Hill has the support of Appomattox Commonwealth’s Attorney Leslie Fleet, who according to his official biography “is responsible directly to the citizens of the County of Appomattox”:
The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land and as such, I will not enforce [prosecute] any state or local statute that violates the federal or state constitutions….
If I believe a law infringes on a 2A right … that law will not be enforced in Appomattox County….
While the resolutions passed in Appomattox and other localities have no legal “teeth” and therefore do not supplant state or federal law, they do voice the majority opinion of their respective localities and it is up to each elected official how they will proceed.
As stated earlier, the Appomattox County Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office interprets gun control laws as unconstitutional and therefore unenforceable.
If Northam has any sense, he won’t cross that bridge. On the other hand if he had any sense he wouldn’t have tried to pass his palette of unconstitutional gun laws in the first place.
GunOwners.org: SECOND AMENDMENT SANCTUARIES: RHETORIC VS. REALITY