This article was published by The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor on Friday, August 30, 2109:
Establishment economists consistently bring a negative cast to their forecasts. Perhaps it’s because their worldview precludes any thought that people allowed to operate in an environment of lower taxes and fewer regulations can actually outperform their models. Perhaps it’s their excessive hubris springing from their Keynesian belief system that they can accurately predict (and thus manage) the future through econometric modeling.
Instead, many of them would benefit from just going shopping at, say, Walmart, Target, Kohl’s, Lowe’s, or Home Depot, and taking note of what’s going on there.
When they make predictions, they embarrass themselves and expose their so-called “profession” for what it really is: not much more than crystal ball gazing mixed with a negative worldview.
Consider Mark Zandi.He just claimed that since million-dollar homes in Aspen, Colorado, are taking three years to sell, it must mean that a recession for the rest of us is certain: “If high-income consumers pull back further on their spending, it will be a significant threat to the economic expansion.”
Mark Zandi fits the mold of an establishment economist perfectly. With economics degrees received from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, he has been steeped in Keynesian economics from infancy.
He has thrived in the culture, writing regularly, if inaccurately, for the Washington Post, the Philadelphia Inquirer and elsewhere. He now serves as the chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, and is, as a result, frequently asked about the health of the U.S. economy.
His typical response: not so well, and likely to get worse. Following revelations that owners of multi-million-dollar homes in Aspen are having to wait up to three years for them to sell, that listings of unsold mansions and penthouses are “piling up” on Realtor.com across the country, that less than half of the cars offered for sale at Pebble Beach car auctions are fetching their asking price, and that art auction sales are down for the first time in years, Zandi thinks this somehow portends a coming recession for the rest of us.
How so? Just how many high-priced mansions can one person live in? How many fancy cars and high-priced art can one person drive, or hang on a wall? How many suits (or pant-suits) can one person wear? How many vacations to Belize can one take? Just how much impact will such extravagance – or decline thereof – have on the U.S. economy?
Looking at where the rest of us spend our money, things continue to be rosy. Recent reports on revenues and earnings from Walmart, Target, Kohl’s, Lowe’s, and Home Depot confirm the health of the economy where the average consumer buys things.
Jobless claims just fell by 12,000 last week, according to the government, with the monthly average remaining well below any trigger reflecting a weakening economy. The number of people collecting unemployment insurance benefits continues to decline as well, falling by another 54,000 last month to a 40-year-plus low.
Consumer confidence continues to reflect the real health of the real economy, with the Conference Board’s “present situation” index just hitting the highest level in 19 years. It added that the number of those polled reporting that jobs are “plentiful” continues to rise, while those reporting jobs are “hard to get” fell again, to record low levels.
There are additional reasons to be confident about the future, according to private money manager John Ricciardi, chief executive of London-based Kestrel Investment Partners. He notes that inventories have been building since the second quarter of 2018, “so it is going to take a little longer, but anywhere from 12 to 15 months later, you start to get a rebound in production very simply because they ran their inventories down.” That “later” is now, which, he says, should lead to a boost in U.S. production and export growth toward the end of the year. He expects that low mortgage rates will ensure a pickup in the housing sector. That’s why he’s investing family money in chemical companies Linde and DuPont, along with Sherwin-Williams in particular right now.
But what about the yield curve “inversion”? It is hardly a predictor of a coming recession because it reflects a flight to both safety and yield by foreign bond investors, driving down rates on the 10-year U.S. Treasury security to below the three-month rate. Joseph Haubrick, writing for the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, put the lie to concerns that such an “inversion” would lead automatically to a recession: “Evidence since the early 1990s suggest that the relationship between the yield curve and growth has shifted, if not disappeared.”
Notes Ricciardi, all it would take to return things to normal would be for the Fed to cut interest rates: “And then, we’ve got a flat yield curve all of a sudden.”
As Ben Casselman wrote in the New York Times on Wednesday, “Economists [like Zandi] are notoriously terrible at forecasting recessions, especially more than a few months in advance.” Adds Tara Sinclair, an economist at George Washington University: “Historically, the best that forecasters have been able to do consistently is recognize that we’re in a recession once we’re in one. The dream of an early warning system is still a dream that we’re working on.”
That’s the malady from which Zandi suffers, along with so many of his establishment colleagues, and gives the rest of us comfort that a three-year waiting list for million-dollar homes in Aspen portends nothing more than wealthy owners wanting to sell are just going to have to wait a little longer.
The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor: Trump Is Keeping Another Campaign Promise: A Robust Economy
The New York Times: A Recession Is Coming (Eventually). Here’s Where You’ll See It First.
“Does the Yield Curve Signal Recession?” from the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
PeoplesPunditDaily.com: Consumer Confidence Unshaken in August, Easily Beating Forecasts
The Wall Street Journal: Younger Workers Report Biggest Gains in Happiness With Pay