Jane Wells, a business news reporter for CNBC, after reviewing the latest report from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) on who pays income taxes in America, claimed that the rich pay them all. The CBO, wrote Wells, showed that the top 20 percent pay nearly 93 percent of all income taxes, while the top 40 percent pay 106 percent of them.

How is that possible? The bottom fifth of earners get more from the government than they pay in taxes. Hence, the anomaly of the so-called “rich” paying more than 100 percent of all income taxes received by the government.

The ’s math is straightforward: for the year 2010, the bottom fifth earned “market income” – wages, business income, capital gains, retirement income and so on – of $8,100 per person. But they also received “government transfers” – cash payments and in-kind benefits such as SNAP – of $22,700, leaving them with a per-person after-tax income of $30,800. Each person’s liability in that group? Exactly zero.

For the second lowest quintile, the numbers for 2010 were similar: income of $30,700 per person, government transfers of $15,200 with income taxes paid of $2,500 per person, leaving them with an after-tax income of $43,400.

This government largess must be paid for in some way, and it’s the remaining three fifths who do the paying, especially the top fifth. Says the CBO, the average earner in the top 20 percent of all wage earners had an income in 2010 of $234,000, received government benefits of $6,500 and paid taxes of $58,900, leaving each with an after-tax income of $181,900. Concluded Wells:

People who make more should pay more, generally speaking. In America, they are …

When it comes to individual income taxes, they’re also covering the entire bill. And leaving a tip…

Fair or not, I will let you be the judge.

Josh Barro, the politics editor at Business Insider, picked a nit with her but not about whether such taxation is “fair” but over her – and the ’s – analysis and conclusion: there are many other taxes aside from income taxes that every sentient soul in the country pays, whether they know it or note: there are payroll taxes, state income taxes, sales taxes, property taxes, excise taxes. There are taxes buried in the cost of gasoline, and in manufactured goods reflecting corporate income taxes. There are employer-paid payroll taxes which properly should be ascribed to the individual earner. And so on. Said Barro, “The federal personal only made up 28% of all U.S. government tax collections in 2012. Federal, state and collected $4 trillion in taxes last year, just $1.1 trillion of that [coming from] federal personal income taxes.” He concluded:

Rich people do pay a lot more taxes than poor people, both in absolute terms and as a percentage of [their] income. But the rich are not paying all the taxes…

Barro nearly avoids any discussion, however, of just how “fair” these taxes are, or should be. If one were determined to extract the maximum government revenue from an economic system, he could employ the Laffer Curve which shows that the maximum revenue to be extracted approaches some 70 percent of income. If it were higher than that, the to produce more would diminish and revenues would go down. If it were lower, the government would be leaving revenues on the table for its original owners to spend as they wished.

There is the “sovereign citizen” argument that says that any extraction above zero represents “involuntary servitude” as explained by philosopher and economist Murray Rothbard:

In a sense, the entire system of taxation is a form of involuntary servitude. Take, in particular, the income tax. The high levels of income tax mean that all of us work a large part of the year — several months — for nothing for Uncle Sam before being allowed to enjoy our incomes on the market.

Part of the essence of slavery, after all, is forced work for someone at little or no pay. But the income tax means that we sweat and earn income, only to see the government extract a large chunk of it by coercion for its own purposes. What is this but forced labor at no pay?

There is the moral argument that the income tax system reinforces the violation of at least two of the Ten Commandments  – Thou shalt to steal and Thou shall not covet – and three of the Seven Deadly Sins – Greed, Sloth and Envy.

There is another response to the unanswered question, however, drawn from Article I Section 8 of the Unites States Constitution: the enumerated powers given to the national government. Prior to the ratification of the 16th Amendment, that national government ran itself on tariffs and excise taxes, at a vastly lower cost. One thing is certain, according to Ron Paul:

The Founding Fathers never intended a nation where citizens would pay nearly half of everything they earn to the government.

Nor did the Founders contemplate such a system of taxation. As Dr. Adrian Rogers, Pastor Emeritus of Bellevue Baptist Church, wrote

What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.

When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that, my dear friend, is the beginning of the end of any nation.



Opt In Image
Soak Up More Light from the Right
with a free copy of Bob's most popular eBook!

Sign up to to receive Bob's explosive articles in your inbox every week, and as a thank you we'll send a copy of his most popular eBook - completely free of charge!

How can you help stop the Democrat's latest gun grab? How is the Federal Reserve deceiving America today? What is the latest Obama administration scandal coverup? Sign up for the Light from the Right email newsletter and help stop the progressives' takeover of America!