That’s the real reason this case has such monumentally profound implications: if the government wins, the feds will have all the legal precedent they need to confiscate guns under the ATT.
Read more ...
Even in a totalitarian state like China, workarounds abound.
Calls for his impeachment are increasing. As Klein proves in his book, they are also valid.
26 Republicans joined Democrats in voting for this non-binding but important resolution: it’s ok to allow states to extract sales taxes from internet companies even if they aren’t located in the state, thus overriding an important Supreme Court case to the contrary along the way.
It’s too soon to rejoice. But that time is coming.
This agency has been in the works since last July, and has been festering in the mind of its creator since 2007. When it is full-blown, in full flower, we’ll discover that the government has fooled us once again. Thinking that they are out to protect us, they instead are enslaving us.
There are so many errors of fact and faulty assumptions and conclusions in that single statement that one scarcely knows where to begin.
What possible constitutional basis can there be for effecting a takeover of the entire financial sector?
While perhaps not as memorable as the “date which shall live in infamy,” this case has been called the most important “separation of powers” case in 20 years by Judge Brett Kavanaugh, the dissenter in the 2-1 decision by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals that ruled for the PCAOB, prior to the case going to the Supreme Court for review).