Two bright guys writing for the Washington Times think so. They write that Republicans in Congress are beginning to grow a backbone, that they’re upset about being steamrolled by and mad that now he wants more:

The appetite for a is growing among Republicans,  who shied  away from one during the debt and fights in the last  Congress but now say one may be needed.

Then they quote various people to back up their statement. This is from brand new Senator (R-Texas):

I  think the last time we saw a shutdown, the fact that Republicans were willing to stand together — on fiscally principles — ended up producing a result that was responsible and that benefited the country and that  ultimately produced enormous economic growth.

When was that, exactly? Was that back in 1994-1995 when the government was shut down for, what, five days? How did that work out? Was government spending cut? Was anything substantial accomplished? Well, Newt Gingrich, then Speaker of the House, lost most of his conservative cred, and never got it back.

Or was it in the summer of 2011 when Speaker Boehner threatened to shut things down and then backed away, deciding instead to kick the ban to December 31, 2012. And just how did that work out, Ted?

The authors then quote Senator John Cornyn (R-Texas) who wrote an editorial in the Houston Chronicle on Friday, saying:

It may be necessary to partially shut down the government in order to secure the long-term fiscal well-being of our country, rather than plod along the path of Greece.

Cornyn sports a less than impressive Index (FI) rating of 83 (translation: he finds it convenient to vote for unconstitutional bills about one out of every five times – this is a conservative?).

And then there’s cheerleader (R-Ky.) – with a dismal FI of 70 – who says that it’s “shameful” that Republicans have to use such tactics:

None  of us like using these situations like the sequester or the debt  ceiling or operation of government to try to engage the president to  deal with this. It’s a  shame we have to use whatever leverage we have in Congress to  get the  president to deal with the biggest problem of our time, and that’s our  excessive spending.

This is a sham and a fraud. Let’s look at the Constitution: Article I, Section 7: “All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives…”

And so just who was it who got us into this mess?

Let’s check the logic on this. The House started the ball rolling by voting for (largely unconstitutional) spending. The went along, the White House signed the bills into law. And now the House is complaining that the president doesn’t want to talk about cutting spending?

There will some noise, perhaps even some shouting. But a government shutdown? Hardly likely. The spending will continue.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Opt In Image
Soak Up More Light from the Right
with a free copy of Bob's most popular eBook!

Sign up to to receive Bob's explosive articles in your inbox every week, and as a thank you we'll send a copy of his most popular eBook - completely free of charge!

How can you help stop the Democrat's latest gun grab? How is the Federal Reserve deceiving America today? What is the latest Obama administration scandal coverup? Sign up for the Light from the Right email newsletter and help stop the progressives' takeover of America!